Institution of Engineering and Technology
The
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET, formerly the Institution of Electrical Engineering, IEE) maintains a
Policy
Advisory Group on possible biological effects of EMFs. The Group
issued a
FactFile
in 2001. In a section entitled “Should I be worried?”,
this concluded for power frequencies:
“It will, unfortunately, never be possible to say with
certainty that fields are safe. Science can never prove that anything
is totally safe. Quite properly, on a sensitive public-health
issue, research continues. However, there is a broad consensus
among the many national and international bodies that have reviewed
the evidence (including the IEE): the balance of the evidence
is against the fields encountered by the public being a cause
of cancer or any other disease.”
They also issue position statements roughly every two years. The
most
recent, in May 2006, concludes:
“At low frequencies, the cumulative evidence from the large
body of literature built up from intensive research over the past
25 years suggests that the existence of harmful health effects
remains unlikely. No generally accepted exemplar of any biological
effect of such fields has been established. However, pooled analyses
of epidemiological studies have suggested an association between
higher magnetic field levels and childhood leukaemia, and a recent
major U.K. study suggests an association with residential proximity
at birth to high voltage overhead power lines. In the absence
of convincing mechanistic and biological evidence of 50/60Hz (“power
frequency”) field effects these epidemiological findings
are difficult to interpret as evidence for a causal link….
In summary, the absence of robust new evidence of harmful effects
of EMFs in the past two years is reassuring. The Group is of the
opinion that this should be a major factor to take into account
by policy makers when considering both the implementation of precautionary
approaches to public exposure and also during the development
of exposure guidelines.”
back
|