Tower Electric and Magnetic Fields Title
 
Possible health risks > Childhood cancer >

Pooled analysis of childhood leukaemia epidemiology

From “A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia”, Ahlbom et al, British Journal of Cancer (2000) vol 83 pp 692-698

Based on Table 3 from the published paper.

Total leukaemia. Relative risks (95% confidence interval in parentheses) by exposure level with adjustment for age, sex and socioeconomic status (measurement studies) and East/West in Germany. Reference level: <0.1 µT. Observed and expected case numbers ≥ 0.4 µT, with expected numbers given by modelling probability of membership of each exposure category based on distribution of controls including covariates.

Type of study
0.1-<0.2 µT
0.2-<0.4 µT
≥ 0.4 µT
≥ 0.4 µT
Observed
Expected
Measurement studies

Canada

1.29 (0.84-1.99)

1.39 (0.78-2.48)

1.55 (0.65-3.68)

13

10.3

Germany
1.24 (0.58-2.62)
1.67 (0.48-5.83)
2.00 (0.26-15.17)
2
0.9
New Zealand
0.67 (0.20-2.20)
4 cases/0 ctrls
0 cases/0 ctrls
0
0
UK
0.84 (0.57-1.24)
0.98 (0.50-1.93)
1.00 (0.30-3.37)
4
4.4
USA
1.11 (0.81-1.53)
1.01 (0.65-1.57)
3.44 (1.24-9.54)
17
4.7
Calculated field studies

Denmark

2.68 (0.24-30.45)

0 cases/8 ctrls

2 cases/0 ctrls

2

0

Finland
0 cases/19 ctrls
4.11 (0.48-35.1)
6.21 (0.68-56.9)
1
0.2
Norway
1.75 (0.65-4.72)
1.06 (0.21-5.22)
0 cases/10 ctrls
0
2.7
Sweden
1.75 (0.48-6.37)
0.57 (0.07-4.65)
3.74 (1.23-11.37)
5
1.5
Summary

Measurements studies

1.05 (0.86-1.28)

1.15 (0.85-1.54)

1.87 (1.10-3.18)

36

20.1

Calculated field studies
1.58 (0.77-3.25)
0.79 (0.27-2.28)
2.13 (0.93-4.88)
8
4.4
All studies
1.08 (0.89-1.31)
1.11 (0.84-1.47)
2.00 (1.27-3.13)
44
24.2

The results for “all studies” are shown in this graph:

Return to the discussion of this analysis and other studies of childhood leukaemia

see also a pooled analysis of night-time exposure

back