Effects on equipment
Implanted Medical Devices and EMFs
Implanted medical devices are pacemakers, implanted defibrillators
and similar. People with these devices may be particularly concerned
about interference from EMFs, so we give quite a lot of detail here.
For a simpler summary and for information on how EMFs interfere
with other equipment, see here.
Advances in medical technology over the past 50 years have resulted
in an increased number of patients who have active implantable medical
devices (AIMDs). There are no longer the constraints there used
to be on these patients and many are able to live active, full lives,
including returning to full-time work. There are however electric
and magnetic fields present in the environment, which can potentially
interact with these devices.
What are Active Implantable Medical Devices?
An active implantable medical device (AIMD) is any medical device
which is intended to be totally or partially introduced, surgically
or medically, into the human body, and which is intended to remain
after the procedure. Some of the more common of these are:
- Pacemakers
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs)
- Neurostimulators
- Cochlear implants
- Insulin pumps
All usually comprise of a small battery-powered box with electronic
circuitry and leads, electrodes and/or sensors, which detect a biological
function or deliver a stimulus. Pacemakers and ICDs are by far the
most common types of AIMDs and these are designed to sense the heart’s
electrical activity and deliver an appropriate form of electrical
stimulation to the heart when necessary.
Pacemakers and Intra-cardiac Defibrillators
The heart produces electrical signals or action potentials, which
need to be reliably detected by pacemakers’ and ICDs’
sensing leads. The heart has its own natural pacemaker, called the
Sino-Atrial Node (SA). Pacemakers and ICDs are needed when problems
arise affecting the heart’s natural cardiac cycle.
Pacemakers are designed to stimulate the heart when either the
heart’s own pacemaker paces at an inappropriate rate or the
heart's electrical conduction system prevents the propagation of
electrical impulses from the native pacemaker to the lower chambers
of the heart. Pacemakers are needed to solve a number of problems
with the hearts cardiac cycle and therefore have to be programmable
and function in a number of different modes.
ICDs are designed to detect and treat ventricular fibrillation
of the heart by sensing the heart’s electrical activity. ICDs
deliver a shock to the heart that is designed to stop the heart’s
activity, allowing it to restart itself at the correct pacing.
The electrical sensitivities of the atria and ventricles vary,
but are both very low. The atrial sensitivity for electrical stimulation
is 0.25-1.6 mV and ventricular is 0.75-4.0 mV, both of which are
so low that EMFs realistically can induce potentials in sensing
leads. The sensitivity setting varies and is dependant on the patient
not the device itself. The sensitivity to external interference
varies greatly between devices; however it is clear that unipolar
sensing is more sensitive than bipolar. Unipolar sensing has only
one lead attached to the atrium or ventricular wall, as apposed
to bipolar, which is attached to both.
The devices themselves are usually tested to EMC standards that
are designed to prevent damage to the device itself, and not the
influence of external fields. Once implanted the sensing of the
devices can be tuned to that which is required by the patient. The
more sensitive the setting of the device the more susceptible to
interference the implanted system can be. Therefore, it is not only
the model of device that is important; it is also the clinical configuration
(including lead location and number, and sensitivity setting of
the device).
Electric and Magnetic Field Interference
EPRI
produced a report in 2004 summarising our current state of knowledge
about interference to implanted cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators
from electric and magnetic fields in the frequency range of 1 hertz
(Hz) to 3 kilohertz (kHz). These found that electric and magnetic
fields could alter the function of pacemakers and ICDs, but electric
fields appear to be the most likely source of interference. The
magnitude or intensity of the magnetic field required to alter the
function of these devices varies widely with frequency and waveform.
Their summary figures are:
Electric fields: sensitivity reported at levels ranging from 1.5
kV/m upwards, though some units are immune at 20 kV/m
Magnetic fields: 100 µT to 1.2 mT may produce interference
There have been very few studies investigating the effects of external
EMFs on pacemaker and ICD function. Recently Trigano et al., (2005)
[link to abstract at bottom of page] examined the risk of interference
by magnetic fields with permanent pacemakers. These investigated
the effects of 100 µT on various patients with differing models
of pacemakers. All pacemakers were set to their maximum sensitivity
settings and subjects walked through the uniform magnetic field.
During the tests only a small incidence of interaction with the
magnetic field was observed. A switch to asynchronous mode was observed
in three patients with devices set to unipolar sensing configuration.
In one patient pacing inhibition occurred after a sustained mode
switch. The conclusions drawn from this large study are that magnetic
fields have a low incidence of interactions at levels up to the
ICNIRP public magnetic field reference levels.
Electric fields can induce currents in the body that can interfere
with the proper operation of pacemakers and ICDs. Electric field
interference with pacemakers has been observed over a range of magnitudes.
Some models show inappropriate behaviour at levels as low as 1.5-2
kV/m. However, modern duel-chamber pacemakers appear unaffected
at levels as high as 20 kV/m.
Most modern pacemakers are designed to revert to fixed rate or
asynchronous pacing when external electric and magnetic fields interfere
with their electronic sensing capability. This is not considered
clinically significant and does not cause adverse health effects.
EMI can potentially result in a range of responses from the pacemaker,
however this is dependant on the characteristics of the signal.
Possible interference outcomes can include:
- Switch to asynchronous pacing or fixed-rate pacing
- Rate increase
- Erratic pacing
- Single beat inhibition (i.e. a single beat is missed by the
pacemaker)
- Total inhibition
These responses are on the whole temporary and the pacemaker will
revert to normal operating parameters once removed from the stimulus.
Advice to patients
Medtronic (manufacturers of AIMDs) produced advice to patients
that high voltage powerlines (400 kV) may cause asynchronous pacing
and suggest a distance of 25 feet between the patient and line should
be maintained. The USA FDA released advice to patients with pacemakers
and ICD, not to lean or linger close to sources of EMFs. But the
UK Department of Health, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency (MHRA),
formerly the Medical Devices Agency, does not consider the transmission
line electric or magnetic fields constitute a significant hazard.
All pacemaker and ICD patients are informed of the potential problems
associated with exposure to EMFs. Interference of electric and magnetic
fields is on the whole temporary, and moving away from the source
will alleviate the response. Advice to patients with AIMDs is to
consult with their cardiologist and the device manufactures if in
doubt about EMF interactions.
The power system is not the only source of possible interference;
patients should also be aware of shop security devices, for example.
CENELEC are in the process of producing a standard for the ‘Assessment,
measurement and calculations of human exposure at the workplace
bearing active implantable medical devices in electric, magnetic
and electromagnetic fields with frequencies from 0 to 100 GHz’.
This standard will allow companies to manage employees with AIMDs.
|
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;45(6):896-900.
Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers
by a magnetic field at power line frequencies.
Trigano A, Blandeau O, Souques M, Gernez JP, Magne I.
Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
Nord, Marseille, France. alexandre.trigano@mail.ap-hm.fr
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the risk of interference
by high magnetic flux density with permanent pacemakers. BACKGROUND:
Several forms of electromagnetic energy may interfere with
the functions of implanted pacemakers. No clinical study has
reported specific and relevant information pertaining to magnetic
fields near power lines or electrical appliances. METHODS:
A total of 250 consecutive tests were performed in 245 recipients
of permanent pacemakers during 12-lead electrocardiographic
monitoring. A dedicated exposure system generated a 50-Hz
frequency and maximum 100-microT flux density, while the electrical
field was kept at values on the order of 0.10 V/m. RESULTS:
A switch to the asynchronous mode was recorded in three patients
with devices programmed in the unipolar sensing configuration.
A sustained mode switch was followed by symptomatic pacing
inhibition in one patient. No effect on devices programmed
in bipolar sensing was observed, except for a single interaction
with a specific capture monitoring algorithm. CONCLUSIONS:
The overall incidence of interaction by a magnetic field was
low in patients tested with a wide variety of conventionally
programmed pacemaker models. A magnetic field pulsed at power
frequency can cause a mode switch and pacing inhibition in
patients with devices programmed in the unipolar sensing configuration.
The risk of interference appears negligible in patients with
bipolar sensing programming.
|
back |