Instruments >
Instruments detail
For a simpler summary of EMF instruments click
here
Measurement of electric and magnetic fields
The first commercial instruments designed specifically for measuring
power-frequency fields became available in the 1980s. There are
now many instruments available, which vary in various characteristics:
| (a) |
Number of axes of detection. There are no
sensors that directly assess a resultant field in a random
direction in space; sensors generally measure the field in
one direction. A meter may have one sensor. If this is aligned
by the user with the direction of maximum field it will give
a reading of the maximum field in a single direction; the
overall resultant field may be between 1.0 and 1.41 times
this value depending on the degree of polarisation. If the
meter has three orthogonal sensors, the resultant field can
be obtained from the three values measured by root-sum-of-squares
addition: Resultant =
. This resultant value is independent of the orientation of
the meter, vastly simplifying use of the meter.
More on elliptically polarised
fields |
| |
|
| (b) |
Measure of field. Various measures of a sine wave are
possible, eg peak, rectified average, root-mean-square (rms).
For a single frequency, ie a pure sine wave, these can be
scaled to give the same result, but in the presence of harmonics
they can differ considerably. In the absence of a known biophysical
mechanism, there is no conclusive basis for asserting that
any one measure is correct. However, by analogy with other
areas of measurement science, there is an assumption that
rms is the preferred measure. Some meters capture the actual
waveform for future analysis. |
| |
|
| (c) |
Frequency response. Instruments may be sensitive to a
single frequency eg 50 Hz or 60 Hz or to a range of frequencies.
If sensitive to a range of frequencies, the response may be
flat or may be proportional to frequency. A flat frequency
response between 20 or 30 Hz and a few kiloherz is generally
regarded as suitable for many general purpose measurements. |
| |
|
| (d) |
Size of sensors. Sensors can be made small – a few
millimetres - and therefore capable of investigating variations
of field over small distances. However, there may also be
times when it is desirable to use larger sensors which measure
the average field over their area. |
| |
|
| (e) |
Readout and logging. Meters may have analogue or digital
displays. They may only display a value in real time, or they
may be capable of logging values with various degrees of sophistication,
and of calculating various parameters of the field such as
averages or maxima. |
| |
|
Given the variations
in facilities provided by a meter, there is an inevitable
variation in size, weight, and battery consumption. Some meters
are most suitable for detailed surveys by experts; others
are small and light enough to be worn by volunteers for extended
periods.
There is no “correct” or “best”
meter. The best meter to use depends on the purpose it is
to be used for.
Measuring
magnetic fields
There are three different sensors widely used for measuring
magnetic fields: |
| (a) |
Search coils. The simplest meters measure
the voltage induced in a coil of wire. For a sinusoidally
varying magnetic field, B, of frequency f, the voltage, V,
induced in the coil is given by:

where f is the frequency of the field and
A is the area of the loop, and
is the component of B perpendicular to the loop.
The voltage induced by a given field increases
with the addition of more turns of wire or of a ferromagnetic
core. To prevent interference from electric fields, the magnetic
field probe must be shielded. If the meter is used for surveys
or personal exposure measurements, frequencies lower than
approximately 30 Hz must be filtered out to remove voltages
induced in the probe by the motion of the meter in the earth’s
magnetic field. |
| |
|
| (b) |
Fluxgate magnetometers. These detect a magnetic field
by the asymmetry it produces in a ferromagnetic material deliberately
driven in magnetic saturation alternately in opposite directions
at a high frequency. |
| |
|
| (c) |
Hall-effect devices. The sensor is designed
to measure the transverse Hall voltage across a thin strip
of semiconducting material carrying a longitudinal current.
Most practical instruments for power frequencies
use search coils, either a single coil or three orthogonal
coils. The coils themselves can either be made as small as
possible, with a ferromagnetic core to increase sensitivity,
for use in personal exposure meters where size and weight
are important criteria; or they can be larger, often 0.1 m
across, to increase sensitivity and provide some spatial averaging.
Fluxgate magnetometers cannot be made as small or as cheap,
but have the advantage of responding to dc fields as well
as ac. Hall devices are little used as their resolution is
poorer and they suffer from drift but have uses at higher
fields. |
Measuring electric
fields
Meters for electric fields usually use as sensors two parallel
conducting plates. Alternative sensors, eg based on rotation of
polarised light, are less common.
Three-axis electric-field meters are available, but single-axis
meters are more common. This is partly because it is harder to make
three-axis meters for electric fields than for magnetic fields,
and partly because in one common measuring situation, near ground
underneath or close to overhead power lines, the electric field
is linearly polarised and in a known direction (vertical), and therefore
a single-axis meter is perfectly sufficient.
A person holding an electric-field meter would perturb the field.
To measure the unperturbed field, the meter is usually suspended
at the end of a long non-conductive horizontal rod or vertical tripod.
The reading is read from a distance on a suitably sized display,
recorded within the meter for later analysis, or transmitted to
a readout device by fibre-optic. This can reduce perturbation to
acceptable levels. However, given the ease of perturbation of electric
fields, it is easy to make erroneous measurements, particularly
when there is:
- extremes of temperature and humidity;
- insufficient distance of the probe from the investigator;
- instability in meter position;
- loss of non-conductive properties of the supporting rod.
Electric fields can also be measured at fixed locations, e.g. under
transmission lines or in laboratory exposure chambers by measuring
the current collected by a flat conducting plate placed at ground
level. For sinusoidal fields, the electric flux density can be calculated
from the area of the plate (A), the permittivity of a vacuum ,
the frequency (f) and the measured current induced in the plate
in the expression below:

Personal exposure meters do exist for electric fields. However,
wearing a meter on the body, perturbs the electric field being measured
in unpredictable ways. Typically, where exposure to electric fields
of large groups of subjects is being measured, a meter is placed
in an armband, shirt pocket or belt pouch (Male et al., 1987; Bracken,
1993). Perturbation of the ambient field by the body precludes obtaining
an absolute value of the field and, at best, the average value of
such measurements reflects the relative level of exposure.
back
|