EMFs.info

Electric and magnetic fields and health

index/glossary | EMFs At A Glance | EMF The Facts (pdf)
  • What are EMFs
    • Terminology – an introduction
    • Electric fields
    • Magnetic fields
    • Units for measuring EMFs
    • Measuring and calculating EMFs
      • EMF instruments and other commercial services
    • Adding fields together
    • Radiofrequencies
    • Screening EMFs
  • Sources
    • Overhead power lines
      • Fields from specific power lines
        • 400 kV
        • 400 kV – specific cases
        • 275 kV
        • 132 kV
        • 66 kV
        • 33 kV
        • 11 kV
        • 400 V/230 V
        • Replacing a 132 kV line with a 400 kV line
      • Summaries of fields from all power lines
      • Factors affecting the field from a power line
        • Voltage
        • Current
        • Clearance
        • Height above ground
        • Conductor bundle
        • Phasing
        • Balance between circuits
        • Balance within circuit
        • Ground resistivity
        • Two parallel lines
      • Calculating and measuring fields from power lines
        • Geometries of power lines
        • Raw data
        • On-line calculator
      • Fields from power lines – more detail on the physics
        • Field lines from a power line
        • The direction of the field from a power line
        • Power law variations in the field from a power line
      • Statistics of power line fields
    • Underground power cables
      • Different types of underground cable
      • Fields from cables in tunnels
      • Gas Insulated Lines (GIL)
      • Underground cables with multiple conductors
      • Effect of height on fields from underground cables
      • Screening fields from underground cables
    • Low-voltage distribution
      • UK distribution wiring
      • USA distribution wiring
    • House wiring
    • Substations
      • National Grid substations
        • Static Var Compensators
      • Sealing-end compounds
      • Distribution substations
      • Final distribution substations
        • Indoor substations
    • Transport
      • EMFs from electric trains (UK)
      • EMFs from cars
    • Appliances
    • Electricity meters
      • Smart meters
      • Traditional meters
    • Occupational exposures
      • Live-line work
      • Static Var Compensators
      • Occupational exposures on pylons
    • Field levels and exposures
      • Personal exposure
      • Other factors that vary with magnetic fields
      • Fields greater than 0.2 or 0.4 µT
      • Fields in different countries
      • How fields vary with time
    • Reducing your exposure
  • Known effects
    • Induced currents and fields
      • Numerical calculations of induced currents
      • Details of numerical calculations of induced currents and fields in the body
    • Effects of EMFs on equipment
    • EMFs and medical devices
      • Types of medical devices
      • Real-life experience of interference with Implanted Heart Devices
      • Laboratory Tests of Implanted Medical Devices
      • Consequences if interference does occur with an implanted heart device
      • Manufacturers of Implanted Heart Devices
      • Standards relating to pacemakers and other AIMDs
      • Interference with hearing aids and cochlear implants
    • Microshocks
      • Control of microshocks in the UK
      • Microshocks from bicycles
    • EMFs, agriculture and the environment
      • Bees and microshocks
      • Behaviour of large mammals in magnetic fields and near power lines
  • Evidence on health
    • Childhood leukaemia
      • Pooled analyses of childhood leukaemia and magnetic fields
      • Number of children affected
      • Childhood leukaemia and night-time exposure
      • Survival from childhood leukaemia
      • Childhood leukaemia and Downs
      • The “contact current” hypothesis
      • The causes of childhood leukaemia
    • Other health effects
      • Other childhood cancer
      • Breast cancer
      • Other adult cancers
      • Cardiovascular disorders
      • Neurodegenerative disorders
      • Epilepsy
      • Reproductive outcomes and disorders
      • Suicide and depression
      • Sleep disturbance
      • Asthma
      • Hypersensitivity
      • Effects of parental exposure to EMFs
    • Scientific review bodies
      • WHO
      • IARC
      • ICNIRP
      • SCENIHR
      • PHE (formerly HPA, formerly NRPB)
      • IET
      • NAS
      • NIEHS
      • California
      • Bioinitiative
    • Electric fields and ions
      • Electric fields and ions – a commentary on the suggestions
      • Electric fields and ions – NRPB comments
      • Skin cancer
      • Air pollution and childhood cancer
      • How many corona ions do power lines produce?
    • Comparing EMFs to other issues
      • EMFs compared to other issues: smoking
      • EMFs compared to other issues: passive smoking
      • EMFs compared to other issues: coffee
      • EMFs compared to other issues: shift work
      • EMFs compared to other issues: cholera
      • EMFs compared to other issues: BSE and variant CJD
      • Comparative risks
  • Research
    • Types of research
      • Research ethics
    • Epidemiology
      • Causation – what can epidemiology show and what can’t it?
      • Confounding
      • Clusters
    • Animal and laboratory experiments
      • Behaviour of large mammals in magnetic fields and near power lines
    • Mechanisms
      • Energy issues in mechanisms
      • Free radicals
      • Melatonin
      • Cryptochromes
      • Total field and AC field
    • Specific studies
      • UKCCS
      • CCRG
        • CCRG distance study
        • CCRG magnetic fields study
        • CCRG “corona ions” paper
        • CCRG follow-on paper
        • CCRG Underground cables paper
        • CCRG “wrap up” paper
        • CCRG Note on distance
        • Responses to the various CCRG papers
      • French Geocap study
      • California power lines study
      • Imperial College study
      • CEGB cohort
      • Transexpo
    • Ongoing research
      • UK electricity industry research
    • Non peer-reviewed science
    • Abstracts of papers
      • Childhood leukaemia abstracts
      • The CCRG (or “Draper”) study abstracts
      • The UKCCS abstracts
      • The CEGB cohort abstracts
      • Alzheimer’s disease abstracts
      • Breast cancer abstracts
      • Suicide and depression abstracts
      • Animal toxicology experiments abstracts
      • Numerical calculations of induced current – abstracts
      • Abstracts related to the Contact Current Hypothesis
      • Abstracts relating to research on fruit flies
      • Abstracts relating to animal behaviour: orientation in magnetic fields and sensing of power lines
  • Exposure limits
    • Limits in the UK
    • Limits in the USA
    • Limits in the EU
    • Limits in the rest of the world
    • Limits from specific organisations
      • ACGIH
      • NRPB 1993
      • ICNIRP 1998
      • EU 1999
      • ICES 2002
      • NRPB 2004
      • EU 2004
      • SBM 2008
      • ICNIRP 2010
      • EU 2013
      • The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016
      • International Guidelines on Non-Ionising Radiation 2018
      • Comparison of exposure limits across frequencies
    • Indirect effects in exposure limits
    • Compliance with exposure limits
  • Policy
    • UK policy
      • Consent for power lines
      • Cross-Party Inquiry
      • Early Day Motions
      • Parliamentary Questions and Answers
      • UK Government and Parliament
    • European EMF policy
    • Power lines and property – UK
      • Corridors round power lines
    • Power lines and property – USA
    • Precaution
    • SAGE
      • SAGE First Interim Assessment
      • Government response to SAGE First Interim Assessment
      • SAGE Second Interim Assessment
      • Government response to SAGE Second Interim Assessment
    • Public Opinion on EMFs
      • Opinion polls conducted by Ipsos MORI on power lines and EMFs
    • Communications on EMFs
    • Litigation on EMFs
  • Finding out more
    • Links
    • Literature
    • Contacts
    • Finding out about other issues
      • Finding out more: Wayleaves and easements
      • Finding out more: Safety clearance distances
      • “Danger of death” notices
      • Finding out more: Audible noise
      • Finding out more: Power lines and satellite navigation
      • Finding out more: Radio and TV interference
  • Static fields
    • Sources of static fields
      • Fields from underground DC cables
      • Effects of static fields on compasses
    • Effects of static fields
    • Static fields – the expert view
      • Types of medical devices
      • WHO – static fields
      • IARC – static fields
      • ICNIRP – static fields
      • PHE – static fields
    • Static field limits
You are here: Home / Research / Specific studies / French Geocap study

French Geocap study

A study of childhood leukaemia and proximity to high-voltage power lines was published in April 2013.

It finds elevated risks within 50 m of the highest voltage lines, but not at greater distances, and not for the lower-voltage lines.

The results in more detail

The main results are reproduced in the following table:

 relative risks and confidence intervals in distance bands
 0-49 m50-99 m

100-199 m

200-599 m>600 m
225-400 kV lines1.7 (0.9-3.6)1.0 (0.5-2.1)0.7 (0.4-1.2)1.2 (1.0-1.4)1.0 (0.8-1.2)
63-150 kV lines1.0 (0.6-1.7)1.2 (0.7-1.9)0.8 (0.6-1.2)1.0 (0.8-1.2)1.1 (1.0-1.2)

The paper then show how this result varies in various subgroups.  The relative risk for the closest distance band, 0-49 m, and for the 225-400 kV lines, varies as follows:

With the age of the child:

 relative riskconfidence interval
0-4 years2.61.0-6.9
5-14 years1.00.3-3.3
  • 0-4 years: 2.6 (1.0-6.9)
  • 5-14 years: 1.0 (0.3-3.3)

With the size of the urban unit:

  • <5000 people: 2.5 (0.8-7.7)
  • 5000-100,000: 4.9 (1.3-19.2)
  • >100,000: 0.4 (0.1-2.9)

Finally, the study had different methods of locating the home, with different potential accuracies.  The main results are for the best estimate of the location.  For some subjects, they had the full address, which they refer to as a GIS uncertainty of 20 m (in fact, the accuracy may not necessarily be this good, for example with appartment buildings).  For others, they identified the actual home from aerial photographs or equivalent, which may be the most accurate of all.

  • Full address: 2.1 (0.9-4.7)
  • Aerial photographs: 1.3 (0.5-1.7)

So the elevated risk seems to be confined to the higher voltage lines, the younger children, and the smaller urban units.

These results are presented in the following graphs:

How the risk varies with voltage of line

 graph of geocap results by voltage

How the risk varies with age of child

 graph of geocap results by age of child

How the risk varies with size of urban unit

graph of geocap results by urban unit

The abstract in full

 

British Journal of Cancer (2013), 1–8  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.128
Childhood leukaemia close to high-voltage power lines – the Geocap study, 2002–2007
C Sermage-Faure, C Demoury, J Rudant, S Goujon-Bellec, A Guyot-Goubin, F Deschamps, D Hemon, and J Clavel

Background: High-voltage overhead power lines (HVOLs) are a source of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MFs), which are classified as possible risk factors for childhood acute leukaemia (AL). The study was carried out to test the hypothesis of an increased AL incidence in children living close to HVOL of 225–400 kV (VHV-HVOL) and 63–150 kV (HV-HVOL).
Methods: The nationwide Geocap study included all the 2779 cases of childhood AL diagnosed in France over 2002–2007 and 30 000 contemporaneous population controls. The addresses at the time of inclusion were geocoded and precisely located around the whole HVOL network.
Results: Increased odds ratios (ORs) were observed for AL occurrence and living within 50m of a VHV-HVOL (OR¼1.7 (0.9–3.6)). In contrast, there was no association with living beyond that distance from a VHV-HVOL or within 50m of a HV-HVOL.
Conclusion: The present study, free from any participation bias, supports the previous international findings of an increase in AL incidence close to VHV-HVOL. In order to investigate for a potential role of ELF-MF in the results, ELF-MF at the residences close to HVOL are to be estimated, using models based on the annual current loads and local characteristics of the lines.

They had previously published a paper giving their methods in more detail:

J Radiol Prot. 2013 Mar 13;33(2):349-365. [Epub ahead of print]
Methods used to estimate residential exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields from overhead power lines in an epidemiological study in France.
Bessou J, Deschamps F, Figueroa L, Cougnaud D.
SourceRéseau de Transport d'Electricité (RTE), Cœur Défense, 110 esplanade du Général de Gaulle, F-92030 La Defense, France.

An epidemiological study of paediatric cancers in relation with various environmental factors is currently being carried out in France. One of these factors is the proximity of children's residences to high voltage overhead lines (63-400 kV). This possible influence will be studied following three criteria, namely 'distance', 'distance-voltage' and 'calculated residential exposure' to extremely low frequency magnetic field (ELF-MF). This paper describes methods for generating and characterising these three criteria of increasing complexity and characterises the influence of the input data in terms of uncertainties in the exposure to ELF-MF assigned to subjects. The method developed for the 'calculated residential exposure' criterion is based on a limited number of configurations of overhead lines, selected to have a representative sample of the French high voltage (HV) network. The calculated exposure is then fitted to each subject and each neighbouring overhead line, taking into account the yearly mean current flowing in the line and the distance of the residence from the power line. All variability factors introduced by this simplified representation have been analysed, classified and quantified to give the best assessment and associated confidence interval of the residential ELF-MF exposure of the subjects. The overall 1σ uncertainty of the calculated residential exposure excluding geo-coding uncertainties is around 8% for subjects living close to power lines with a known current load and 17% for the others.

Latest news

  • How has the reported risk for childhood leukaemia changed over time? February 11, 2019
  • Media stories about microshocks in children’s playground September 10, 2018
  • New studies on leukaemia and distance from power lines June 1, 2018
  • UK media interest in the causes of childhood leukaemia May 22, 2018
older news

Contact Us

To contact the electricity industry’s EMF Unit Public Information Line (UK only):
telephone 0845 7023270 or email EMFHelpLine@nationalgrid.com.

See Contact us for more contact details including our privacy policy.

About this site

  • What this site covers and what it doesn’t
  • Industry policy
  • Sitemap

Specific questions

  • Affected by a new power line or substation?
  • Building or developing near a power line or substation?
  • Terminology – an introduction
  • Microshocks
  • Pacemakers and other medical devices
  • EMF policy in the UK
Site Authorship |Sitemap | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies | Site Statistics
© 2019 EMFS.info

EMFs.info Cookies Policy

Our Website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please read our Cookie Policy for more information about cookies and how we use them.

Close
Navigation
  • What are EMFs
    • Terminology – an introduction
    • Electric fields
    • Magnetic fields
    • Units for measuring EMFs
    • Measuring and calculating EMFs
      • EMF instruments and other commercial services
    • Adding fields together
    • Radiofrequencies
    • Screening EMFs
  • Sources
    • Overhead power lines
      • Fields from specific power lines
        • 400 kV
        • 400 kV – specific cases
        • 275 kV
        • 132 kV
        • 66 kV
        • 33 kV
        • 11 kV
        • 400 V/230 V
        • Replacing a 132 kV line with a 400 kV line
      • Summaries of fields from all power lines
      • Factors affecting the field from a power line
        • Voltage
        • Current
        • Clearance
        • Height above ground
        • Conductor bundle
        • Phasing
        • Balance between circuits
        • Balance within circuit
        • Ground resistivity
        • Two parallel lines
      • Calculating and measuring fields from power lines
        • Geometries of power lines
        • Raw data
        • On-line calculator
      • Fields from power lines – more detail on the physics
        • Field lines from a power line
        • The direction of the field from a power line
        • Power law variations in the field from a power line
      • Statistics of power line fields
    • Underground power cables
      • Different types of underground cable
      • Fields from cables in tunnels
      • Gas Insulated Lines (GIL)
      • Underground cables with multiple conductors
      • Effect of height on fields from underground cables
      • Screening fields from underground cables
    • Low-voltage distribution
      • UK distribution wiring
      • USA distribution wiring
    • House wiring
    • Substations
      • National Grid substations
        • Static Var Compensators
      • Sealing-end compounds
      • Distribution substations
      • Final distribution substations
        • Indoor substations
    • Transport
      • EMFs from electric trains (UK)
      • EMFs from cars
    • Appliances
    • Electricity meters
      • Smart meters
      • Traditional meters
    • Occupational exposures
      • Live-line work
      • Static Var Compensators
      • Occupational exposures on pylons
    • Field levels and exposures
      • Personal exposure
      • Other factors that vary with magnetic fields
      • Fields greater than 0.2 or 0.4 µT
      • Fields in different countries
      • How fields vary with time
    • Reducing your exposure
  • Known effects
    • Induced currents and fields
      • Numerical calculations of induced currents
      • Details of numerical calculations of induced currents and fields in the body
    • Effects of EMFs on equipment
    • EMFs and medical devices
      • Types of medical devices
      • Real-life experience of interference with Implanted Heart Devices
      • Laboratory Tests of Implanted Medical Devices
      • Consequences if interference does occur with an implanted heart device
      • Manufacturers of Implanted Heart Devices
      • Standards relating to pacemakers and other AIMDs
      • Interference with hearing aids and cochlear implants
    • Microshocks
      • Control of microshocks in the UK
      • Microshocks from bicycles
    • EMFs, agriculture and the environment
      • Bees and microshocks
      • Behaviour of large mammals in magnetic fields and near power lines
  • Evidence on health
    • Childhood leukaemia
      • Pooled analyses of childhood leukaemia and magnetic fields
      • Number of children affected
      • Childhood leukaemia and night-time exposure
      • Survival from childhood leukaemia
      • Childhood leukaemia and Downs
      • The “contact current” hypothesis
      • The causes of childhood leukaemia
    • Other health effects
      • Other childhood cancer
      • Breast cancer
      • Other adult cancers
      • Cardiovascular disorders
      • Neurodegenerative disorders
      • Epilepsy
      • Reproductive outcomes and disorders
      • Suicide and depression
      • Sleep disturbance
      • Asthma
      • Hypersensitivity
      • Effects of parental exposure to EMFs
    • Scientific review bodies
      • WHO
      • IARC
      • ICNIRP
      • SCENIHR
      • PHE (formerly HPA, formerly NRPB)
      • IET
      • NAS
      • NIEHS
      • California
      • Bioinitiative
    • Electric fields and ions
      • Electric fields and ions – a commentary on the suggestions
      • Electric fields and ions – NRPB comments
      • Skin cancer
      • Air pollution and childhood cancer
      • How many corona ions do power lines produce?
    • Comparing EMFs to other issues
      • EMFs compared to other issues: smoking
      • EMFs compared to other issues: passive smoking
      • EMFs compared to other issues: coffee
      • EMFs compared to other issues: shift work
      • EMFs compared to other issues: cholera
      • EMFs compared to other issues: BSE and variant CJD
      • Comparative risks
  • Research
    • Types of research
      • Research ethics
    • Epidemiology
      • Causation – what can epidemiology show and what can’t it?
      • Confounding
      • Clusters
    • Animal and laboratory experiments
      • Behaviour of large mammals in magnetic fields and near power lines
    • Mechanisms
      • Energy issues in mechanisms
      • Free radicals
      • Melatonin
      • Cryptochromes
      • Total field and AC field
    • Specific studies
      • UKCCS
      • CCRG
        • CCRG distance study
        • CCRG magnetic fields study
        • CCRG “corona ions” paper
        • CCRG follow-on paper
        • CCRG Underground cables paper
        • CCRG “wrap up” paper
        • CCRG Note on distance
        • Responses to the various CCRG papers
      • French Geocap study
      • California power lines study
      • Imperial College study
      • CEGB cohort
      • Transexpo
    • Ongoing research
      • UK electricity industry research
    • Non peer-reviewed science
    • Abstracts of papers
      • Childhood leukaemia abstracts
      • The CCRG (or “Draper”) study abstracts
      • The UKCCS abstracts
      • The CEGB cohort abstracts
      • Alzheimer’s disease abstracts
      • Breast cancer abstracts
      • Suicide and depression abstracts
      • Animal toxicology experiments abstracts
      • Numerical calculations of induced current – abstracts
      • Abstracts related to the Contact Current Hypothesis
      • Abstracts relating to research on fruit flies
      • Abstracts relating to animal behaviour: orientation in magnetic fields and sensing of power lines
  • Exposure limits
    • Limits in the UK
    • Limits in the USA
    • Limits in the EU
    • Limits in the rest of the world
    • Limits from specific organisations
      • ACGIH
      • NRPB 1993
      • ICNIRP 1998
      • EU 1999
      • ICES 2002
      • NRPB 2004
      • EU 2004
      • SBM 2008
      • ICNIRP 2010
      • EU 2013
      • The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016
      • International Guidelines on Non-Ionising Radiation 2018
      • Comparison of exposure limits across frequencies
    • Indirect effects in exposure limits
    • Compliance with exposure limits
  • Policy
    • UK policy
      • Consent for power lines
      • Cross-Party Inquiry
      • Early Day Motions
      • Parliamentary Questions and Answers
      • UK Government and Parliament
    • European EMF policy
    • Power lines and property – UK
      • Corridors round power lines
    • Power lines and property – USA
    • Precaution
    • SAGE
      • SAGE First Interim Assessment
      • Government response to SAGE First Interim Assessment
      • SAGE Second Interim Assessment
      • Government response to SAGE Second Interim Assessment
    • Public Opinion on EMFs
      • Opinion polls conducted by Ipsos MORI on power lines and EMFs
    • Communications on EMFs
    • Litigation on EMFs
  • Finding out more
    • Links
    • Literature
    • Contacts
    • Finding out about other issues
      • Finding out more: Wayleaves and easements
      • Finding out more: Safety clearance distances
      • “Danger of death” notices
      • Finding out more: Audible noise
      • Finding out more: Power lines and satellite navigation
      • Finding out more: Radio and TV interference
  • Static fields
    • Sources of static fields
      • Fields from underground DC cables
      • Effects of static fields on compasses
    • Effects of static fields
    • Static fields – the expert view
      • Types of medical devices
      • WHO – static fields
      • IARC – static fields
      • ICNIRP – static fields
      • PHE – static fields
    • Static field limits